//

Are these new logos super or sucky?

Are these new logos super or sucky?

Becky Sarniak

Aug 06, 2014

A brand may choose to change their logo for many reasons. In 2011, Starbucks changed their logo so that their name and “coffee” was no longer contained within their logo, a reflection of Starbucks’ efforts to move beyond coffee. Olive Garden recently changed their logo as part of a “brand renaissance.” With the controversy surrounding the name of the Washington Redskins, is a logo change imminent?

A logo can instantly identify a brand and evoke a whole range of consumer thoughts, memories and emotions. When my nephew was 3 years old (before he could read), he could point out the names of restaurants we passed based on the logos… even restaurants he had never visited before, indicating the power of a recognizable logo. So how does a logo change impact consumer loyalty, perception and consumer preferences?  Those are great questions, but we’ll save them for another blog post. Today, we are just interested in figuring out which of the following new logos work, who did it best, and who should have just left well enough alone. Cast your votes now! [socialpoll id=”2152587″ type=”set”][socialpoll id=”2214437″][socialpoll id=”2214438″]

Becky Sarniak

Becky Sarniak

Research Manager

What I love about research is learning about people and what they think. Discovering the reasoning behind behavior and what motivates people to move from a plan of action to action itself.

iModerate’s online qualitative interviews have been enormously helpful to us during the concept testing phase of research. iModerate provides us with invaluable feedback from a nationally representative group of Americans within a very short time frame. Not only do we get this data quickly, but it is also high quality. iModerate’s moderators are skilled at asking questions that yield useful responses. iModerate reports provide information that’s more than interesting, it’s actionable.

Sara Bamossy, Senior Strategic Planner, Saatchi & Saatchi LA